Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.
US citizens: call on the WTO to limit fishing before sharks and tuna are wiped out.
US citizens: call on reject section 702 of the U SAP AT RIOT Act, which has a loophole that the NSA uses to snoop on US citizens without a warrant.
For more information.
US citizens: call on Stop the Pentagon’s Warfare-Powering AI Data Centers
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
I am deeply concerned about the Pentagon’s plans to build data centers for computers to decide who to bomb.
In addition, just by running the data centers, the Pentagon will make nearby American cities unlivable, by making water and electricity scarce and expensive. 7-in-10 Americans oppose data centers being built in their communities because of the hardship they create.
I urge you to block the Pentagon from building new taxpayer-subsidized data centers. And please don't be quick to call them "AI", because that is a marketing hype campaign which we should not boost.
US citizens: call on major media to stop climate-hushing.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: call on your congresscritter and senators to stop the persecutor's $1.8 billion insurrection slush fund.
In my letter I called it a step in a coup.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.
To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.
Please spread the word.
US citizens: call on your congresscritter and senators to stop the Pentagon's warfare-powering supposed-intelligence data centers.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.
To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.
Please spread the word.
US citizens: call on your representative and senators to support real, comprehensive gun violence policy reform.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.
To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.
Please spread the word.
US citizens: call on your congresscritter and senators to vote NO on the $70B blank check for the deportation thugs.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.
To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.
Please spread the word.
US citizens: call on your congresscritter and senators to put a windfall profits tax on fossil fuels, and spend the money building renewable generation.
To do this, you can use this campaign and modify the text to add that suggestion for spending.
I did this because my congresscritter and senators are notably progressive. If yours are Republicans, it might be better strategy to in your case to support campaign's own suggestion -- to use the tax money as a rebate to ease Americans' immediate suffering.
See the instructions for how to sign this letter campaign without running any nonfree JavaScript code--not trivial, but not hard.
US citizens: Join with this campaign to address this issue.
To phone your congresscritter about this, the main switchboard is +1-202-224-3121.
Please spread the word.
The California Governor primary is particularly vexing this year because, being an open primary, the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, so it's possible for the mediocre batch of Democrats to split the vote and we end up having to pick between two Republican ghouls in the general. So this year's primary is more game-theoretic than I'd prefer.
You only have one week left (June 2).
Some highlights from the guide:
Governor: Tom Steyer:The primary for Governor is a clown car filled with seven mediocre Democrats and two scary Republicans. Because there's a real chance both slots for the November election could go to Republicans, we urge you to vote strategically. We skipped over some long-shot progressive candidates in favor of a progressive-enough candidate who has the best shot at beating the corporate Democrats now, and winning in November.
We're going with Tom Steyer: the straight, white billionaire boomer who's juuuuust progressive enough.
At one point we thought about just flipping a coin and choosing between Tom Steyer and Katie Porter. Porter's whiteboard sessions were on point, but we doubt her ability to win: she ran statewide for the U.S. Senate in 2024 and came in third, with only 15% of the vote. As of late April, she's polling at 9%. Porter was progressive but has moved to the right. While she's gone back and forth on supporting the minimum wage increase, we need someone who will stand firm with workers and everyday Californians. And weirdly enough that's billionaire Tom Steyer. [...]
US Congress, District 11: Connie Chan:
[...] it's unclear that Saikat's millions will buy him a victory in the primary, and it's even less clear that he would win in November without the support of the labor unions and community groups that are backing Chan (and may not throw down for a wealthy tech bro). If Saikat ends up being on the ballot in November we'll reassess. But for now, It's a no-brainer: Connie Chan is the only candidate who can beat Scott Wiener in November and bring San Francisco values to Congress. Let's send Connie Chan to DC!
Curious why Scott Wiener is terrible? Click through to read our previous voter guide writeups, but basically: he's madly pro-cop, pro-developer, pro-YIMBY (trickle-down housing) with a gloss of pro-LGBTQ pinkwashing. Oh, and Weiner lost the California SEIU endorsement because he opposes Prop D, the Overpaid CEO tax.
Prop B: Weird Do-Nothing Tweak to Term Limits: No! Why??
[...] So why do we have Prop B? Because the moderates are so scared of Aaron Peskin running again, they think this is the only way to stop him. 🙄
Prop D: Overpaid CEO Salary Tax: Hell Yes!
Between Props C and D, only one can pass. Each has a poison pill that negates the other, so the one that gets the most votes over 50% will go into effect.
Unions and community organizations put Prop D, the Overpaid CEO Salary Tax, on the ballot to fill the gaping hole Trump's Big Bullshit Bill ripped in the City budget. Downtown businesses put Prop C on the ballot as a smokescreen to confuse voters and defeat Prop D.
Prop D is not gonna hurt regular people. It's not gonna drive companies out of the city. It only applies to companies with (a) top executives who earn 100 times their median workers' salary, (b) over 1000 employees, and (c) over $1 billion in revenue. Prop D would generate an extra $300 million in revenue a year to pay for vital neighborhood services, like medical clinics and in-home health care for seniors, that are on the chopping block this year in yet another of Mayor Lurie's "austerity budgets." [...]
If Prop C gets more votes than Prop D, big businesses will have torpedoed a truly progressive "tax the rich" opportunity, losing the City $260 -- 270 million a year. Make sure you vote on both: Vote No on C and Hell Yes!!! on D.
Insurance Commissioner: Jane Kim:
Jane Kim is proposing to create a public insurer for natural disasters, much like the system in New Zealand, and she promises to use the office to rein in the powerful industry and develop new, functional alternatives.
(Jane Kim was the only good supervisor we ever had in District 6 / SOMA -- she's the reason The Oasis still exists -- and so if she thinks Insurance Commissioner is a good use of her skills, I'm gonna take her word for it.)
See also Mission Local's extensive election coverage.
Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.
This new effort follows President Donald Trump's National Security Presidential Memo 7, which instructs the Department of Justice to target anyone holding "anti-American," "anti-Christian," and "anti-capitalism" beliefs. [...]
"The chaotic atmosphere that may result from emergent AI technology in the next five years may fuel large-scale protests that devolve into civil unrest and anti-tech violent extremist activity, especially in large urban areas such as New York City," the report reads. [...]
"These intelligence reports are part of a long tradition of agencies identifying protest or even simply having strong opinions as precursors to violence," Spencer Reynolds, senior counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, tells WIRED. "Suspicious activity reports are incredibly unreliable, often about vague or innocent behavior, issued under permissive standards. These reports, often received in large volumes, allow officers to inject their own biases and see what they want to see in the facts."
Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.
Matt Stoller thinks Google's next goal is to control nearly all prices based on collecting personal information about nearly all purchases and personal preferences.
See https://www.consumerreports.org/money/questionable-business-practices/instacart-ai-pricing-experiment-inflating-grocery-bills-a1142182490/ and https://substack.com/redirect/d27787e6-e804-4231-8f23-2eaf0e1bc652?j=eyJ1IjoiMmRjd2YyIn0.m51z6BBZ0nK06POYEEH_mMhm8t1iRiokalBUx8IccKE
It is unfortunate that Stoller effectively boosts this scheme by describing it with the term "artificial intelligence".
There’s a new math result which is a milestone for AI mathematics. It’s a human readable and insightful result on a conjecture of some renown. It improves on a previous construction of Erdos to make a set of points in the plane with a relatively large number of unit distances between them.
Where the AI got its inspiration from can be as ineffable as it is for humans, but there’s a plausible narrative that it got direct inspiration from the Erdos construction. A proof tells a story, and the moral of the story belongs to the reader not the storyteller. To some the Erdos construction is a story about square grids. But it can also be read as a story about taking an algebraic construction, finding a projection onto geometric space which preserves unit distances, and then solving a number theory problem in the algebraic space to have lots of unit distances. Instead of using the straightforward grid structure the new construction uses a more esoteric algebraic construction, involving pulling in a powerful theorem from a completely different place. In a funny detail the underlying number theory problem it relies on is fairly trivial while the Erdos one requires some work. That is not coincidental with there being a lot more edges: the requirements for them to work are much less stringent.
The obvious question is: What does it look like? The papers and articles contain no pictures of the new construction and there’s a reason for that but another reason one should be included anyway. The construction used for small examples produces some very tesseract-looking things and at larger scales looks like a point cloud without any obvious nice geometric properties. At the smaller scale where the structure can be gleaned it looks actively counterproductive, producing fewer distance coincidences than the Erdos construction. You have to crank up the number of dimensions and the radius of the ball up quite a bit before it starts getting favored, and by then the number of points has become huge.
But that doesn’t mean there can’t be a picture! You can have a density plot where regions with more points points are darker, and having the picture may yield geometric insights which the algebraic construction was obfuscating. Does it look like the shadow of a sphere? A disc? A Gaussian plot? Whatever the shape is, the next question is: How big is the unit distance compared to the width of the shape? Here is where it gets interesting: It appears to be that the distance is quite small. For me that starts raising alarm bells. Didn’t we already crop to within a ball in the algebraic construction? Yes we did, but that was to make the number of points finite, not to reduce the geometric range. The projection between the algebraic and geometric space makes many things look very different with the one exception that certain exactly unit distances stay unit. Other distances get scrambled. So that raises the next question: Why can’t we just crop geometrically to some small constant factor of the unit distance at the end, thus making a much better result by reducing the denominator? This might actually work! It depends on just how much smaller the cropping is and how sparse of a region can be found. I honestly don’t know if it works out, and don’t have the tools to analyze this because it’s a bizarre jump back into geometric space from algebraic but it’s plausible and the benefits might be big, so it’s certainly worthy of further analysis.
The concrete bounds now stand at there being a lower bound on the polynomial exponent of 1.014, up from the previously conjectured to be optimal value of 1. The known upper bound is 4/3. That range of possibilities is very interesting and we most definitely have not heard the last word on this. The AI construction just showed 1+e and the 1.014 is a later explicit improvement. Maybe there will be a polymath project on it.
Talking to AI (specifically Opus 4.7) about this is very interesting. It can read through the whole construction no problem, and talk about it fluently. But then when it gets into discussing geometric insights its intuition is garbage. With some prodding I can get it to understand basic points, and it readily understand after they’re pointed out that these are very basic things, but it just can’t wrap its brain around anything without having it explained. It seems like the new construction is exactly the thing it happens to be super good at: Tackling something purely symbolically, pulling in outside theorems and constructions from seemingly totally unrelated areas, following a roadmap which had already been laid out for it. Drawing from geometric intuitions is something which it simply can’t do. The contrast is very bizarre in this particular case where it’s going from genius to idiot talking about the exact same problem with the perspective shifted only slightly. I haven’t, and probably won’t, grok the full new construction, but it was able to explain the basics outline of the construction to me and construct some basic examples, which was fun and interesting.
The other notable thing about the AI strength here is that this is a constructive proof. AI seems to be better at that than proofs of nonexistence, which is consistent with it being fast and not having much insight. Constructions require fiddling around until you find something, with much clearer partial results along the way, where with proofs of non-existence you have to intuit a roadmap or you don’t make any obvious headway until the very end. The proof of the Robbins conjecture is similar: The core insight is up front realizing that you can find a counterexample to Modus Tollens and then do proof by contradiction. After that it looks a lot more like finding a solution to a post substitution problem than a meaningful proof.
WP 7.0 was just released and apparently this is the "AI" release. Is there a patch to excise this cancer from core, or is there a bugfix-tracking fork that I should switch to instead, or should I just never upgrade again, or what? Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.
I thought: enough is enough, I need to figure out what clown service these are coming from and start blocking whole networks.
Nope, they're almost all from cable modems, not from hosting facilities:
49.43.169.105 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 49.36.222.165 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 49.207.199.34 "24309 | IN | apnic | 2004-12-08 | CABLELITE-AS-AP Atria Convergence Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Broadband Internet Service Provider INDIA, IN" 60.254.88.85 "17488 | IN | apnic | 2000-11-28 | HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over Cable Internet, IN" 14.176.188.15 none 113.181.115.52 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 222.252.180.57 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.191.68.81 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 203.162.75.165 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.166.25.40 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.234.181.48 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.232.16.94 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.226.156.45 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.186.56.201 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.27.88.193 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.24.165.158 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.23.84.13 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.173.75.211 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.254.59.191 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.247.93.88 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 134.122.23.167 "14061 | US | arin | 2012-09-25 | DIGITALOCEAN-ASN - DigitalOcean, LLC, US" 113.184.185.188 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.170.114.205 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.236.40.167 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.170.244.63 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.165.28.93 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 163.223.48.0 "138797 | IN | apnic | 2019-02-11 | COASTAL-AS-IN Coastal Broadband And Online Services Pvt. Ltd., IN" 58.249.137.74 "17622 | CN | apnic | 2001-01-18 | CNCGROUP-GZ China Unicom Guangzhou network, CN" 39.68.1.38 "4837 | CN | apnic | 2001-09-17 | CHINA169-BACKBONE CHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone, CN" 14.191.63.98 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.168.114.54 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.161.135.60 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.228.183.221 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.177.130.34 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.236.8.100 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 144.31.35.211 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 14.230.66.236 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.166.3.113 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 143.20.253.201 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 14.172.46.240 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.191.87.248 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.240.145.79 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 171.250.165.14 "7552 | VN | apnic | 2002-10-08 | VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Group, VN" 14.230.54.62 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.180.27.31 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 177.137.214.144 "263087 | BR | lacnic | 2012-04-18 | Rawnet Informatica LTDA, BR" 120.140.8.61 "4788 | MY | apnic | 1996-10-20 | TTSSB-MY TM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SDN. BHD., MY" 49.37.213.156 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 216.75.132.173 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 144.31.35.77 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 216.75.132.173 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 216.75.132.173 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 144.31.35.77 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 144.31.35.77 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 216.75.132.173 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 216.75.132.173 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 143.20.253.246 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 143.20.253.246 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 14.169.142.16 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.190.135.174 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.165.212.210 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.165.39.79 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.254.166.139 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.170.190.94 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.31.236.195 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.175.2.197 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.245.142.32 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.168.130.126 none 14.234.120.102 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.187.7.237 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.169.200.172 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.187.7.158 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 222.253.132.0 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.179.243.6 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.189.84.206 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.189.125.112 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.27.175.238 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.179.139.90 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 216.75.132.167 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 216.75.132.167 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 14.191.192.133 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 216.75.132.212 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 207.180.11.239 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 207.180.11.239 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 113.186.16.134 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.170.25.114 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.229.9.235 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.188.28.166 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 123.16.224.122 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.173.194.120 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.239.74.25 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.239.32.210 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 14.177.207.17 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 113.173.255.127 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 144.31.35.232 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US" 181.213.41.191 "28573 | BR | lacnic | 2003-11-27 | Claro NXT Telecomunicacoes Ltda, BR" 113.182.199.97 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 88.235.232.128 "9121 | TR | ripencc | 1998-12-29 | TTNET, TR" 181.191.153.5 "267488 | BR | lacnic | 2017-08-17 | Pronet Construcoes LTDA, BR" 211.241.113.62 "9316 | KR | apnic | 1998-06-03 | DACOM-PUBNETPLUS-AS-KR DACOM-PUBNETPLUS, KR" 152.58.183.66 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 59.184.62.53 "9829 | IN | apnic | 2000-01-19 | BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN" 14.164.166.200 "45899 | VN | apnic | 2009-08-28 | VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN" 152.57.115.213 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 49.34.210.1 "55836 | IN | apnic | 2010-10-27 | RELIANCEJIO-IN Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, IN" 1.246.164.57 "9318 | KR | apnic | 1998-06-03 | SKB-AS SK Broadband Co Ltd, KR" 31.223.92.91 "12735 | TR | ripencc | 1999-10-18 | ASTURKNET, TR" 103.66.177.245 "135578 | BD | apnic | 2016-06-18 | DIT-AS-AP Muhammad Nasir ta Dhaka Information Technology, BD" 152.42.242.171 "14061 | US | arin | 2012-09-25 | DIGITALOCEAN-ASN - DigitalOcean, LLC, US" 143.20.253.31 "401560 | US | arin | 2025-01-03 | ONECABLE - OneCable Network LLC, US"
"and the question every CEO eventually has to answer: who's next?"
Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.
I weep for the future.
Planet Debian upstream is hosted by Branchable.